[ad_1]
On Wednesday evening, Project Veritas launched the second a part of its collection on New York Times reporter Matthew Rosenberg, who mentioned that protection of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot was overblown and that “there were a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol.”
Rosenberg spoke concerning the story about Trump’s “pee tape,” which made waves in 2018, saying it was primarily fabricated, “it involved CIA and NSA,” he mentioned. “It involved Trump and involved that ridiculous, like, ‘pee tape,’ which of course doesn’t exist.”
In 2017, BuzzFeed printed “…sections of an unverified intelligence report on former President Donald Trump’s relationship with Russia, frequently referred to as the Steele Dossier,” which claimed there was video of Trump partaking in lewd acts whereas on a visit to Russia.
Rosenberg additionally mentioned that in The New York Times newsroom there’s “…a real internal tug of war between, like the reasonable people and some of the crazier leftist sh*t that’s worked its way in there.”
He added, “They’re not the majority, but they’re very vocal, loud minority that dominate social media and, therefore, has just hugely outsized influence,” and mentioned he believes that is “alienating” its subscribers.
Rosenberg known as his coworkers at The New York Times “bullies,” “neurotic” and “…not the clearest thinkers…”
Rosenberg additionally mentioned coworker Adam Goldman, saying, “He’s a terrible writer… He’s just not good at conceptualizing things. He’s not good with words. It’s a skill. It’s a hard one.”
Rosenberg added “…editors do all his writing for him.”
Referencing the ongoing authorized battle between The New York Times and Project Veritas, Rosenberg mentioned, “James O’Keefe,” referencing the Project Veritas founder, “that was a f*ck up. We may well lose that one.”
O’Keefe confronted Rosenberg with the footage to which the Times reporter mentioned he “absolutely” stands by the feedback made.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink
