Skip to content
the Conservative TAKE

the Conservative TAKE

Pop Culture / Politics filtered RIGHT!

  • Home
  • Network
    • Red Liberty Media
    • The Marty Chronicles
    • The Right Therapist
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • TCT URLs
    • Privacy Policy
  • STORE
  • JOIN
  • Toggle search form
  • ROOTS’ White LIE #shorts YouTube
  • “ROOTS” lied about this too! East Africa Slave Trade #shorts YouTube
  • $5 MILLION for Reparations is NOT Enough says WOKE san Francisco official. YouTube
  • “ROOTS” lied about this too! #shorts YouTube
  • Judge is Clueless about Constitution #shorts YouTube
  • What Novak Djokovic’s Win Means YouTube
  • How Roots Lied #shorts YouTube
  • Trump calling for violence? #shorts YouTube

SCOTUS Considers MS Abortion Law – Will the Roe Precedent Stand?

Posted on 12/02/202112/02/2021 By TCT Admin No Comments on SCOTUS Considers MS Abortion Law – Will the Roe Precedent Stand?
Share on Social Media
  • Tweet

[ad_1]

Please respect our republishing tips – Click Here

SCOTUS Considers MS Abortion Law – Will the Roe Precedent Stand?

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 01: Demonstrators carry massive photographic cut-outs of members of the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, a case a couple of Mississippi regulation that bans most abortions after 15 weeks, on December 01, 2021 in Washington, DC. With the addition of conservative justices to the court docket by former President Donald Trump, consultants consider this could possibly be the most essential abortion case in many years and will undermine or overturn Roe v. Wade. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Wednesday morning, December 1, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. The case examines a brand new Mississippi regulation that seeks to ban abortion after the fifteenth week of being pregnant, a transfer that challenges the nationwide established order. Scott G. Stewart, solicitor normal for the State of Mississippi, went first, arguing for the Supreme Court to desert its rulings in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. He did very properly below sustained questioning from liberal justices, particularly Sonia Sotomayor. While the legal professionals for the different aspect did properly sufficient, they stumbled a bit extra and, maybe extra importantly, rested the energy of their argument on course of relatively than the Constitution.

New banner Legal Affairs with Scott

Stewart is a former regulation clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas, and it was rapidly obvious he was very comfy arguing earlier than the Court. Most of his difficult interactions got here from Justice Sotomayor, which is becoming as a result of Thomas and Sotomayor are bookends relating to abortion on the High Court. If any votes might be taken without any consideration on this case, these two are far and away the odds-on favorites. Justice Thomas has written and spoken extensively about the Court’s jurisprudence on this space, and he’ll nearly actually write to overturn Roe and Casey. The reverse is true for Justice Sotomayor, who seemingly by no means met an imposition to elective abortions she discovered permissible.

Esse Quam Videri

Sotomayor went after Stewart first, and the thrust of her colloquy, which she repeated and which was joined later by Justice Stephen Breyer, had a fantastic little bit of irony baked in. She described the legislative historical past of the Mississippi regulation they had been analyzing, together with a number of statements by legislators in that state that the regulation ought to move as a result of the composition of the Supreme Court had modified. Sotomayor urged that, with out new scientific data, the regulation had handed as a result of Mississippi thought it might get it by way of the Supreme Court at this stage. She argued that adjustments in the political make-up of the Court are usually not a great motive for it to re-examine the abortion concern. She requested, “Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the constitution and its reading are just political acts?” and later, “If people actually believe that it’s all political, how will we survive?”

Sotomayor’s questions indicate that it will be politically untenable for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe and Casey as a result of these selections can be seen as political. The imposition then is for the Court to behave politically to save lots of no matter is left of its repute of being past politics. It makes your head spin, and naturally, has no grounding in the Constitution. Stewart replied that “the court docket might very, very powerfully say ‘Look, our legitimacy really derives from our willingness to stand strong and stand firm in the face of whatever is going on and stand for constitutional principles …’”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh used his questioning to tidy up what the state of Mississippi was asking for in a series of questions. Stewart agreed with Kavanaugh that:

 “The Constitution is silent and therefore neutral on the question of abortion. In other words, that the Constitution’s neither pro-life nor pro-choice on the query of abortion, however leaves the concern for the individuals of the states, or, maybe, Congress to resolve in the Democratic course of …”

Perhaps the weakest of all arguments one can provide to maintain Roe and Casey untouched is that they’re already on the books. Julie Rikelman, litigation director of the Center for Reproductive Rights, argued on behalf of Jackson Women’s Health Organization and led with simply such an argument. Stare decisis is Latin for “to stand by things decided.” In brief, it’s the doctrine of precedent. And the ideas it enshrines are that it will be fully untenable for society if courts issued wildly disparate rulings on related issues of regulation. It is a strong precept of jurisprudence and one all of us profit from, with nice limits, nonetheless.

SCOTUS Considers MS Abortion Law – Will the Roe Precedent Stand?

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Change Is Good, Except When It Isn’t

Strict adherence to stare decisis’ personal constructs would require the Supreme Court to acknowledge human slavery as authorized, as an illustration. What then are the placid waters of consistency price?

Chief Justice Roberts mentioned the language in Casey relating to reputation and overturning precedent. He stated, “it seemed to me to have a paradoxical conclusion that the more unpopular the decisions are, the firmer the court should be in not departing from prior precedent. It’s sort of a super stare decisis, but it’s super stare decisis for what is regarded as by many as the most erroneous decisions.”

Missing Justice Ginsburg

Both Ms. Rikelman and U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar confirmed poor type by indirectly answering hypotheticals from the justices. Using hypothetical arguments to achieve the coronary heart of authorized points begins on day one in regulation faculty, and these advocates’ unwillingness to interact Supreme Court Justices in the act of listening to the case stood out like a sore thumb. Justice Samuel Alito wrestled with Prelogar till he had sufficient:

“I still don’t have your answer clearly. Can decision be overruled simply because it was erroneously wrong? Even if nothing has changed between the time that that decision and the time when the court is called upon to consider whether it should be overruled? Yes or no? Can you give me a yes or no answer on that?”

It took her rather a lot longer than one phrase to get out, however the reply was “no.” That is, the present place of the Biden administration, and the Department of Justice, is that it isn’t applicable for the Supreme Court to overturn a precedent on the foundation that the authentic ruling was incorrectly determined. Solicitor General Prelogar’s presence and arguments themselves current proof the apolitical nature of the Court is a fantasy. Her arguments are the official arguments in the case on behalf of the United States. If Donald Trump had been president, a special particular person can be solicitor normal, making arguments in direct contravention to the ones she supplied. Alas, the line between tragedy and comedy is commonly too diffuse to make out clearly.

The pro-lifers undoubtedly had a greater day at oral argument than the pro-choice advocates on Wednesday. Just how a lot that can translate to the Supreme Court’s eventual opinion(s) on the case stays to be seen. This Court watcher follows a easy maxim good for these on both aspect of any concern earlier than them: If you anticipate to be upset, you received’t be let down. A choice is predicted by summer time.

~ Read extra from Scott D. Cosenza. 



[ad_2]

Source hyperlink

Social Media
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Pinterest
  • Discord
  • Telegram
  • Gab
Home Tags:Abortion, Considers, Law, maga, Precedent, Roe, SCOTUS, Stand

Post navigation

Previous Post: Medical examiner who performed Jeffrey Epstein’s autopsy resigns
Next Post: Brian ­Stelter, Jake Tapper Reportedly Gunning for Chris Cuomo’s Primetime Gig – OutKick

Related Posts

  • Washington Football Team Reportedly Down To Three Potential Nicknames – OutKick Home
  • U.S. Strengthening Ties with the Philippines — Good Home
  • GP’s Jim Hoft Joins The War Room with Steve Bannon to Discuss the IMPOSSIBLE Arizona Election Results (VIDEO) Home
  • “Today is Joe Biden’s 80th Birthday” – Schiff Grilled About Whether Biden is Too Old to Run Again (VIDEO) Home
  • Rushdie-Attack Suspect: Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini ‘a Great Person’ Home
  • After Destroying Individual Rights, China’s President Xi Arrives at 25th Anniversary of Handover to Claim “Beginning of True Democracy in Hong Kong” Home

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe

 

Follow us

Telegram

LIVE CALL IN

Recent Posts

  • House Member Wants Biden, Harris To Resign After Chinese Spy Balloon Scandal
  • Something’s Very Strange About Harry’s “Older Woman/Virginity” Story Now That We Know Who She is…
  • Study Reveals: Several Chicago Neighborhoods Riskier for Young Men Than What U.S. Troops Faced in Iraq and Afghanistan
  • Sounds About Right: University of Chicago Taps Losers Beto O’Rourke and Tim Ryan to Teach Politics
  • China Issues Statement on US Shooting Down of Balloon: “A Clear Overreaction and a Serious Violation of International Practice”

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • Why the parties NEVER switched! WalkAway
  • Interview with Youtube’s ConservativeGuy | #WalkAway WalkAway
  • The Southern Strategy is a Myth | Candace Owens is Right & Here’s the proof WalkAway
  • #WalkAway Campaign – Kyle Suggs at Gettysburg WalkAway
  • How Judicial Overreach Can Kill WalkAway
  • Frank Oz & Star Wars – Kit Harington & Game of Thrones – Negative Comments – Me & #WalkAway WalkAway
  • How to Disprove a Social Justice Warrior Quickly and Easily WalkAway
  • Thank you! #WalkAway Series in the Works WalkAway

Navigate

  • Home
  • Network
    • Red Liberty Media
    • The Marty Chronicles
    • The Right Therapist
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • TCT URLs
    • Privacy Policy
  • STORE
  • JOIN

Categories

Archive Calendar

December 2021
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Nov   Jan »

Copyright © 2023 the Conservative TAKE.

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme

Please wait...

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get updates as well as our newletters.
I agree to Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTER NOW

Subscribe to Our YouTube Channel

Subscribe

×