[ad_1]
Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology president — and obvious abortion advocate — Richard Hanania weighed in amongst critics of the Supreme Courts determination to permit the Texas “Heartbeat Law,” which can successfully ban abortions after six weeks of being pregnant, noting that stricter abortion legal guidelines might imply that extra kids shall be born with Down Syndrome.
Although Hanania didn’t seem to make a price judgment on the matter in his tweet, he’s clearly supportive of legal guidelines permitting mother and father to elect to abort a otherwise abled little one, together with a toddler with Down Syndrome — and he goes on to counsel that the “whole developed world” would look down on Americans who permit such barbarism.
“You can’t screen for Down syndrome before about 10 weeks, and something like 80% of Down syndrome fetuses are aborted. If red states ban abortion, we could see a world where they have five times as many children with Down syndrome, and similar numbers for other disabilities,” Hanania wrote.
He later insisted that he was merely making an empirical statement, however in a second tweet, he added that America “[c]ould be outliers in the whole developed world. There are already negative stereotypes of Americans in these states, one can imagine it getting much more extreme. What if they also ban genetic engineering and embryo selection, while other places go ahead?”
It might come as no shock that Hanania is a proponent of genetic engineering.
He later prompt that conservatives may be scandalized by the fruits of their help for abortion restrictions when a bigger social security internet is required and that liberals may change their minds if their tax {dollars} had been rerouted to states with a number of new Down Syndrome kids.
“Will they maintain their belief in a small safety net and lower government spending in such a world? Would liberals change their minds about government spending if it ends up going to states that have much higher costs due to these laws? Many interesting things to think about,” he mentioned.
The response was, in fact, overwhelming — and never in the way in which Hanania doubtless anticipated.
“I’m perfectly happy with a world with more people with Down syndrome in it,” conservative podcaster Allie Beth Stuckey fired again. “I’m sorry you aren’t. Big eugenicist energy.”
Others identified that Hanania doubtless wasn’t alone in his notion of how abortion bans may play out. Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was a recognized eugenicist, in spite of everything.
“It’s helpful when the pro-abortion movement is this clear about their motivations,” Republican strategist Matt Whitlock famous.
“This is the worst take I’ve read in a long time,” commentator Calvin Robinson added. “People with Down Syndrome are people, Richard. They are loved and valued like everyone else. Show some compassion. You’re talking about human beings as if they are undesirable quantities to be eradicated through eugenics. Wicked.”
Others prompt that Hanania should not know many pro-lifers.
“Yes— pro-lifers believe everyone, even those with Down syndrome or other physical or intellectual disabilities, have the right to life. And most pro-lifers believe more needs to be done for parents & families in these difficult situations to help them care for & raise these kids,” Jerry Dunleavy famous.
The Daily Wire is one in all America’s fastest-growing conservative media firms and counter-cultural shops for information, opinion, and leisure. Get inside entry to The Daily Wire by changing into a member.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink
