Skip to content
the Conservative TAKE

the Conservative TAKE

Pop Culture / Politics filtered RIGHT!

  • Home
  • Network
    • 🇬🇧 Ethan Winstanley
    • Red Liberty Media
    • The Marty Chronicles
    • The Right Therapist
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • TCT URLs
    • Privacy Policy
  • STORE
  • JOIN
  • Toggle search form
  • Funny London Street fight Video YouTube
  • Ronny dew bar Belfast St.patrick Guinness 8.4 out 10 St.patrick day YouTube
  • @EthanWinstanley Irish Revenge in Dublin YouTube
  • @EthanWinstanley Irish Vigilantes confront r×cist Nigerian in Dublin MUST SEE! YouTube
  • MUSLIM APOLOGIST EXPOSES HIMSELF YouTube
  • MIGRANT SCAM EXPOSED YouTube
  • MIGRANT SMUGGLERS CAUGHT YouTube
  • MIGRANT CAUGHT FLASHING IN SHOPPING CENTRE YouTube

Cursing cheerleader wins First Amendment battle at Supreme Court

Posted on 06/23/2021 By TCT Admin No Comments on Cursing cheerleader wins First Amendment battle at Supreme Court
Share on Social Media
  • Tweet

[ad_1]

The Supreme Court on Wednesday discovered {that a} Pennsylvania college district had overstepped its authority when it punished a cursing cheerleader for her social media posts.

In an 8-1 choice, the courtroom discovered that, on this explicit case, Mahanoy Area High School’s pursuits in regulating the now-graduated scholar Brandi Levy’s off-campus speech have been inadequate to beat her personal rights to free expression. Justice Stephen Breyer delivered the courtroom’s opinion. Justice Clarence Thomas issued a lone dissent.

SUPREME COURT CONSIDERS FREE SPEECH IMPLICATIONS IN HIGH SCHOOL CHEERLEADER’S FIRST AMENDMENT CASE

Levy’s case arose in 2017 when Levy didn’t make her varsity cheer squad and responded with a Snapchat story, posted on a Saturday and off campus, wherein she stated, “F*** school. F*** softball. F*** cheer. F*** everything.” When college members noticed the publish, the varsity banned her from the game for a 12 months.

Levy and her mother and father teamed up with the American Civil Liberties Union to take the case to courtroom, arguing that the varsity had broadly overreached into her private life. The college responded that, underneath a 1969 Supreme Court choice permitting colleges leeway in regulating scholar speech, it might punish her as a result of Levy’s publish had “substantially” disrupted college order. Several decrease courtroom judges sided with Levy, discovering that call didn’t apply.

Breyer, whereas cautious to guard colleges’ means to control some off-campus speech, wrote that it was clear that the varsity had gone too far in Levy’s case.

Chief among the many causes, he stated, was the context of Levy’s publish, particularly that the Snapchats weren’t aimed at the varsity and have been posted for a semiprivate viewers of Levy’s Snapchat mates. The undeniable fact that Levy didn’t make her posts on a weekday was one other main issue, which disadvantaged the varsity of the argument that it was performing in loco parentis.

“There is little to suggest a substantial interference in, or disruption of, the school’s efforts to maintain cohesion on the school cheerleading squad,” Breyer concluded.

At the identical time, Breyer stated he didn’t agree with the way in which wherein decrease courts had sided with Levy. These selections had been too broad, he wrote, mentioning that colleges typically have an curiosity in regulating speech off-campus, particularly within the case of “severe bullying” or threats aimed at college students or academics.

Breyer added that in latest a long time, it has grow to be tougher to find out what’s technically on-campus and off-.

“Particularly given the advent of computer-based learning, we hesitate to determine precisely which of many school-related off-campus activities belong on such a list,” he wrote, saying that it might be tough to put down a tough rule.

Similar questions divided the justices throughout the case’s arguments. Justice Samuel Alito, in a concurrence joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, wrote that, greater than answering questions on college regulation of speech, the case acted as a warning to academics and directors wading into that territory.

“If today’s decision teaches any lesson, it must be that the regulation of many types of off-premises student speech raises serious First Amendment concerns, and school officials should proceed cautiously before venturing into this territory,” he wrote.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Thomas in his dissent wrote that the courtroom had ignored that colleges “historically could discipline students in circumstances like those presented here.”

“Courts (and schools) will almost certainly be at a loss as to what exactly the Court’s opinion today means,” he wrote.



[ad_2]

Source hyperlink

Social Media
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Pinterest
  • Discord
  • Telegram
  • Gab
Home Tags:Amendment, Battle, cheerleader, Court, Cursing, Supreme, wins

Post navigation

Previous Post: Oakland crowd twerks on ambulance, blocks responders after deadly shooting
Next Post: US ‘trust’ in news is world’s lowest, Trump loss killed ‘interest’

Related Posts

  • Holy Cow… Dinesh Explains What’s Overflowing Out Of This FedEx Bin, and You’ll Be BLOWN AWAY Home
  • Tom Brady Reportedly Spent Some Of His 11-Day Camp Vacation With Son And Ex-Wife Home
  • Leader Of Trucker Convoy To DC Has A Message For Biden: ‘End The Mandates’ Home
  • Left Leaning NPR Tells Employees Things Aren’t Going Well; Company To Lay Off 10% Of Workforce Home
  • 🗽
    WATCH LIVE: 5:30 EST – RSBN Coverage Of The Lower Manhattan Rally For Trump, Brought To you By The New York Young Republican Club Home
  • Biden Border Crisis: Deadliest Mass Drowning at the Border in Recent Years — Eight Illegal Immigrants Found Dead in Rio Grande, Texas Home

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe

 

Follow us

Telegram

LIVE CALL IN

Recent Posts

  • Philadelphia Residents Rush to Buy Water After Major Chemical Spill Occurs in Delaware River
  • John Kerry Says More Climate Mandates Coming From Biden Regime, Including Executive Orders and “Changes on Automobile, On Light Truck, Heavy Truck…” (VIDEO)
  • Twitter Employees Reportedly Put on Notice with 2:30 am Message from Elon Musk
  • Choose Truth over Tenderness
  • Turkey Announces Support for China’s Peace Plan to Resolve War in Ukraine if It Creates “Foundation of Negotiations”

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018

Navigate

  • Home
  • Network
    • 🇬🇧 Ethan Winstanley
    • Red Liberty Media
    • The Marty Chronicles
    • The Right Therapist
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • TCT URLs
    • Privacy Policy
  • STORE
  • JOIN

Categories

Archive Calendar

June 2021
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« May   Jul »

Copyright © 2023 the Conservative TAKE.

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme

Please wait...

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get updates as well as our newletters.
I agree to Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTER NOW

Subscribe to Our YouTube Channel

Subscribe

×